Needs when it comes to content associated with systematic work of this pupil. The part regarding the supervisor
The requirements for assessing pupil research
1. The therapy associated with the research. It’s important that even if utilising the systemic and integration approaches, it ought to be an operate in therapy, without an evident bias in management generally, advertising, pedagogy, legislation, philology, etc.
2. The standard of relevance and practical need for the investigation dilemmas.
3. The amount of elaboration of theoretical product: overview of the literature, comprehensively showing the developments of domestic and international researchers about this subject. Not merely the literature referencing is welcomed, but in addition analysis, contrast and benchmarking the various views of boffins, based on that your student formulates the author’s place.
4. The connection between theoretical and material that is empirical. Relevance of the study at the mercy of its content.
5. collection of diagnostic tools and research test.
6. The degree of research outcomes.
7. The degree of interpretation of research results (level of analysis).
8. The standard of guidelines distributed by the pupil potential audience.
9. Quality of work’s design.
10. The degree of research’s independence. The research should really be carried out because of the pupil separately, with all the participation of other people just as topics or specialists. Duplication and copying of studies carried out by other authors (plagiarism) is strictly forbidden. The current presence of aspects of separate systematic imagination, the formulation and reason of unique method of solving the debatable dilemmas regarding the concept and training of psychology, the independent nature associated with presentation associated with the product plus the formula of conclusions in line with the outcomes of the study are valued.
11. innovative approach. You will find topics which can be examined in various combinations by pupils from year to 12 months – they’re not appreciated. An interesting subject is respected, the choice of revolutionary practices, writer’s practices and just about every other manifestation of imagination.
Work can be considered unsatisfactory by the after criteria.
1. scientific studies are perhaps perhaps not mental.
2. The research subject does not match its content.
3. The study had not been carried out or partially carried out. Continue reading “Needs when it comes to content associated with systematic work of this pupil. The part regarding the supervisor”